The possibilities of IP over Coax

Using the somewhat old-fashioned coaxial cable to transmit digital signals from network cameras may sound illogical.
However, this can be an excellent solution in practice.
Until 1990, data traffic between computers was carried out via coaxial cables.
The signals from analog security cameras also ran through this cable network by default.
In the meantime, many analogue cameras have been and are being replaced by digital versions, network cameras.
By default, these send their digital signal over network cables; directly to a recorder or to a switch in the network.
Therefore, when you replace an analog camera system with a digital system, you not only need to replace the cameras, but also the cabling.
At least, that seems the most obvious.
However, this is not always necessary.
There are two reasons why it is sometimes better to reuse the existing coaxial cabling for transmitting the digital camera signals.
We call this ‘IP over coax’.

Achieving cost savings

The first reason is the cost of the replacement work.
Because if the cables are located in complex cable ducts, are concealed in walls or floors or are outside underground, the total replacement costs can be quite high.
This is despite the fact that network cables are cheaper than coaxial cables.
IP over coax does require converters on both sides of the coaxial cable.
These convert the network signal into a signal that can be transmitted via the 2-core coaxial cable.
This technique is not new.
Internet service providers have been using it for years to transmit television and internet signals to homes.
Admittedly, this involves only one connection, whereas a camera system often involves several connections.
This means that multiple converters or multi-converters are needed.
This will incur additional costs and you will naturally have to ask yourself whether the costs for this outweigh the costs involved in replacing the coaxial cabling.

Volg ons op Linkedin

When distance is a problem

A second reason to reuse the existing coaxial cabling is the fact that network cables can only cover a limited distance.
If that distance is greater than 100 meters, the network cable is no longer suitable.
With coax, large distances – up to 1500 meters – can be bridged in one go.
If there are these kinds of longer distances, it is definitely better to keep the coaxial cabling.
In this case, it is not the cost that is decisive, but IP over coax that is simply the only right solution.
However, you should take into account the fact that the converters need power supplies for these kinds of long distances.
Sometimes on both sides.
Fortunately, analogue cameras were supplied with power supplies in a decentralized manner.
So that shouldn’t be a problem.
With the right converters, your new cameras can also be equipped with Power over Ethernet, in fact Power over Coax.

Coax – not so bad after all

It is therefore not always necessary to replace the existing coaxial cabling when you switch to a digital camera system.
The total replacement cost or the distances to be bridged can be reasons to reuse the coaxial cabling.
Of course, this is only possible if the existing cabling is still in good condition.
Also, no analog amplifiers should be used in the connection.
IP over coax can be cost-efficient and is sometimes even a necessary solution due to the large distances that need to be bridged.
The reuse of an existing infrastructure that is still in good condition is also good for the environment.

COAXIAL cable has a central insulated conductor surrounded by a copper sheath that provides a form of shielding.
Basically, coax is a 2-core cable.
Different thicknesses of coaxial cable are available.
For bridging long distances, thicker (and more expensive) cable is available.

NETWORK CABLE is also called twisted pair cable because of the specific twist of 8 individual cores in pairs of two.
This makes high speeds possible, now up to 10Gbit/s.
This type of cable is cheaper than a coaxial cable.